Apply / your decision record

Make the call.
Explain your decision.

Identify the facts that matter, any missing evidence and the next action. Name the responsible role and explain what would change your decision. Do not assume that an unmentioned approval, exception or assessment exists. Allow around 8–12 minutes.

One useful record

YOUR CASE / RISKS BEYOND ACCURACY

A manager receives a convincing voice message apparently from the finance director requesting an urgent supplier payment. Separately, HR proposes an AI video tool to infer candidates' emotions. Marketing wants to publish an AI image resembling a competitor's logo.

Your output / a practical record

Risk and verification card

Make the next decision explicit. Connect it to evidence, unresolved questions and an accountable role.

Draft: Risk and verification card

1. Claim or proposed AI use2. People and rights affected3. Bias or prohibited-practice red flag4. Rights and permissions to verify5. Independent verification action6. Decision, escalation owner and record

Check your reasoning

I identified separate risks in the payment message, emotion-analysis proposal and marketing image.I distinguished a convincing voice or image from verified identity or permission.I named an independent verification step and an owner for stopping or escalating each concern.I recorded the evidence and affected people without distributing unnecessary sensitive material.

This is a self-review. Compare with the worked example if you need help. Every field needs a response of at least 10 characters; text length does not assess its quality.