Apply / your decision record

Make the call.
Explain your decision.

Identify the facts that matter, any missing evidence and the next action. Name the responsible role and explain what would change your decision. Do not assume that an unmentioned approval, exception or assessment exists. Allow around 8–12 minutes.

One useful record

YOUR CASE / HIGH-RISK CLASSIFICATION IN DEPTH

A supplier offers three education features: sorting uploaded files, recommending a learner's next course from performance data and evaluating exam answers. It claims all are preparatory because teachers can override them. A public institution plans to use the evaluation feature.

Your output / a practical record

Article 6 classification and exception memorandum

Make the next decision explicit. Connect it to evidence, unresolved questions and an accountable role.

Draft: Article 6 classification and exception memorandum

1. System, version and intended purpose evidence2. Exact Annex III or Annex I route3. Decision effect, harm and profiling analysis4. Each claimed Article 6(3) condition and evidence5. Provider documentation and registration route6. Conclusion, reviewer, limits and reassessment triggers

Check your reasoning

I considered the sorting, course-recommendation and exam-evaluation functions separately.I tested the claimed exception against decision effect, profiling and available evidence.I stated a provisional conclusion, specialist reviewer and unresolved documentation responsibilities.I recorded purpose, version, limits and reassessment triggers for the memorandum.

This is a self-review. Compare with the worked example if you need help. Every field needs a response of at least 10 characters; text length does not assess its quality.