L3-M3 / Governance & compliance
Fundamental rights impact assessment
Loan officers usually follow the AI recommendation. Who could be excluded, and how could they challenge the result? Build the impact assessment around them.
Your fictional workplace case
Security checked. Rights still at stake.
The lender has assessed technical protection.
Affected people and routes to challenge still need analysis.
What you will create
A draft: FRIA working template
Use the fictional case to record evidence, explain a provisional decision and identify the next owner or action. This is a learning draft for self-review, not approved documentation for a real organisation.
See what goes into your worksheet
- Scope decision, system and intended process
- Duration, frequency and affected groups
- Rights, specific harms and exposure pathways
- Human oversight and provider information
- Mitigations, governance and complaint routes
- Residual issues, notification, approval and update triggers
From understanding
to better judgement.
Two lessons, a workplace decision and a final check.
Scope the assessment around affected people
A lender plans to use a creditworthiness recommendation system.
Lesson 1 · 10–15 min02 / LEARNTurn impacts into oversight and remedies
The lender has identified potential exclusion and discrimination.
Lesson 2 · 10–15 min03 / APPLYApply what you learned
FRIA working template
Workplace task · 8–12 min04 / CHECKCheck your understanding
Apply the ideas to 15 workplace questions.
Final check · 5–10 minSkills you will practise on the case
A method for your
next work decision.
- Determine whether Article 27 applies to the deployer and use.
- Map affected people, rights, impacts and safeguards.
- Coordinate the FRIA with DPIA and governance processes.
- Document the assessment, notification and update decisions.
The case is fictional. Timing is a planning estimate; pause whenever you need. This module is a learning activity, not a verified professional certification.