Apply / your decision record

Make the call.
Explain your decision.

Identify the facts that matter, any missing evidence and the next action. Name the responsible role and explain what would change your decision. Do not assume that an unmentioned approval, exception or assessment exists. Allow around 8–12 minutes.

One useful record

YOUR CASE / FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT

A private lender plans to use high-risk AI to evaluate natural persons' creditworthiness. The tool produces recommendations that loan officers usually follow. The team has a security assessment but no analysis of exclusion, discrimination or the ability of rejected applicants to challenge a decision.

Your output / a practical record

FRIA working template

Make the next decision explicit. Connect it to evidence, unresolved questions and an accountable role.

Draft: FRIA working template

1. Scope decision, system and intended process2. Duration, frequency and affected groups3. Rights, specific harms and exposure pathways4. Human oversight and provider information5. Mitigations, governance and complaint routes6. Residual issues, notification, approval and update triggers

Check your reasoning

I identified affected borrowers, exclusion and discrimination pathways, and ways to challenge decisions.I distinguished the existing security assessment from missing fundamental-rights analysis.I assigned safeguards, oversight, complaint routes and owners for unresolved impacts.I recorded assessment scope, provider information and notification or update decisions for review.

This is a self-review. Compare with the worked example if you need help. Every field needs a response of at least 10 characters; text length does not assess its quality.