Apply / your decision record

Make the call.
Explain your decision.

Identify the facts that matter, any missing evidence and the next action. Name the responsible role and explain what would change your decision. Do not assume that an unmentioned approval, exception or assessment exists. Allow around 8–12 minutes.

One useful record

YOUR CASE / GENERAL-PURPOSE AI IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN

A product team is choosing a model for a branded customer-service assistant that may later be adapted for insurance pricing. One vendor has signed the GPAI Code of Practice, another releases weights openly, and a third offers little documentation but promises the highest benchmark score.

Your output / a practical record

GPAI supplier due-diligence questionnaire

Make the next decision explicit. Connect it to evidence, unresolved questions and an accountable role.

Draft: GPAI supplier due-diligence questionnaire

1. Model identity, version, release and provider2. Capabilities, limitations and intended integrations3. Article 53 documentation and downstream information4. Copyright policy, training summary and open-source basis5. Systemic-risk status, security and incident cooperation6. Change notice, evidence gaps and integration decision

Check your reasoning

I identified the model, system integration and proposed future insurance use separately.I distinguished code participation, open weights and benchmark claims from the evidence each actually provides.I assigned ownership of documentation gaps, supplier cooperation and integration approval.I recorded versions, change notices, security dependencies and exit arrangements.

This is a self-review. Compare with the worked example if you need help. Every field needs a response of at least 10 characters; text length does not assess its quality.