Apply / your decision record

Make the call.
Explain your decision.

Identify the facts that matter, any missing evidence and the next action. Name the responsible role and explain what would change your decision. Do not assume that an unmentioned approval, exception or assessment exists. Allow around 8–12 minutes.

One useful record

YOUR CASE / STANDARDS AND OTHER EU LAWS

A company offers an AI product to a financial institution and plans to reuse it in a connected industrial device. Its roadmap contains a single task called obtain ISO certification. The team assumes this will satisfy the AI Act, DORA and cybersecurity rules. It has not identified the product routes, contractual evidence or phased application dates.

Your output / a practical record

Integrated compliance roadmap

Make the next decision explicit. Connect it to evidence, unresolved questions and an accountable role.

Draft: Integrated compliance roadmap

1. Use, product boundary, markets and operator roles2. Applicable regimes and scope rationale3. Requirements, standards and evidence mapping4. Application dates, transitions and dependencies5. Responsible owners, resources and release gates6. Review triggers, evidence status and unresolved questions

Check your reasoning

I mapped the financial and industrial uses to their actual product boundaries and roles.I distinguished legal requirements from voluntary certification and unsupported equivalence claims.I assigned specialist scope checks, owners and dependencies in an initial roadmap.I recorded evidence status, application-date checks and triggers for updating the roadmap.

This is a self-review. Compare with the worked example if you need help. Every field needs a response of at least 10 characters; text length does not assess its quality.