Skip to content
Skip to content

L1-M5 / AI literacy

Company rules and transparency

A chatbot, a synthetic public figure and a public-interest article need different transparency decisions. Who owns each one?

Your fictional workplace case

Ready to publish. Ready to explain?

01 / case evidenceThree formats

Chat interaction, generated image and edited article.

02 / the decision at stakeDifferent duties

A single AI label does not answer every disclosure question.

NOTICE · MARK · DISCLOSE
Around 35–50 min, at your pace One decision record to take away0/4 parts complete

What you will create

A draft: AI use and disclosure decision record

Use the fictional case to record evidence, explain a provisional decision and identify the next owner or action. This is a learning draft for self-review, not approved documentation for a real organisation.

See what goes into your worksheet
  • Use, owner and approved tool
  • Audience and publication channel
  • Provider or deployer responsibility
  • Applicable disclosure and exception analysis
  • Notice wording and placement
  • Review, incident route and retention
Preview the workplace task →

From understanding
to better judgement.

Two lessons, a workplace decision and a final check.

Skills you will practise on the case

A method for your
next work decision.

  • Apply a practical AI-use policy to daily tasks.
  • Distinguish provider marking from deployer disclosure duties.
  • Recognise disclosure exceptions without overclaiming them.
  • Report incidents and preserve proportionate evidence.
UseIdentify the use and audience
TransparencyCheck notice and disclosure duties
OwnershipAssign responsibility and record

The case is fictional. Timing is a planning estimate; pause whenever you need. This module is a learning activity, not a verified professional certification.