Apply / your decision record

Make the call.
Explain your decision.

Identify the facts that matter, any missing evidence and the next action. Name the responsible role and explain what would change your decision. Do not assume that an unmentioned approval, exception or assessment exists. Allow around 8–12 minutes.

One useful record

YOUR CASE / AI GOVERNANCE

A group with several subsidiaries has 40 recorded AI uses. IT approves technical access, procurement signs contracts and compliance reviews a few high-risk projects. Nobody owns decisions after launch. The board receives only the number of staff trained.

Your output / a practical record

AI governance charter and decision matrix

Make the next decision explicit. Connect it to evidence, unresolved questions and an accountable role.

Draft: AI governance charter and decision matrix

1. Scope, principles and accountable executive2. System owners and specialist roles3. Decision rights and escalation thresholds4. Lifecycle gates and evidence requirements5. Monitoring, reporting and challenge process6. Review cadence, resources and unresolved decisions

Check your reasoning

I addressed the group's missing post-launch ownership rather than only its training count.I identified gaps in decision rights and evidence instead of assuming existing approvals cover the lifecycle.I assigned owners, escalation thresholds and independent advisory or challenge roles.I specified review gates, reporting cadence and evidence of issue closure.

This is a self-review. Compare with the worked example if you need help. Every field needs a response of at least 10 characters; text length does not assess its quality.