Skip to content
Skip to content

L2-M1 / lesson 2 of 2

Document the conclusion and review triggers

The retailer documents its conclusion before purchase.

10–15 min · 0/4 steps complete

Start here / A workplace decision

Make a classification reviewable

The retailer documents its conclusion before purchase.

The owner claims an exception because a human can override the result.

Before you read / Think it through

In “Make a classification reviewable”, what would you check or do first?

Pause and form your answer, then compare the reasoning. This reflection is not scored.

Compare the reasoning

Test every relevant condition against evidence; override alone does not establish an exception.

The ideas below give you a method for this decision. Then work through the rest of this case and try the decisions yourself.

Part 1 of 4 Learn the ideas
0 of 5 read

Article 6 paragraph 3

Some Annex III systems may qualify for a narrow exception.

The no-significant-risk condition and listed task condition must be met.

In the workplace

A reviewer in the process does not automatically make a ranking system preparatory or harmless. Check material influence and profiling.

Remember this

Profiling natural persons prevents this exception.

The workplace case
YOUR CASE / CLASSIFYING AI SYSTEMS BY RISK

A retailer is buying one platform with three functions: drafting adverts, ranking job applicants and predicting warehouse maintenance. The supplier calls the whole platform low risk. A manager proposes adding biometric emotion analysis to video interviews.

Quick reference / five key ideas
Article 6 paragraph 3
Profiling natural persons prevents this exception.
Transparency can coexist
A high-risk system can also create synthetic content.
Evidence for classification
Record who reviewed uncertainty and why.
Reclassification triggers
Procurement approval is not permanent permission.
Dates and transition facts
Existing-system and sectoral rules require their own check.